Proof, in the order we can honestly show it

We publish our own numbers.
Most agencies won't.

This page holds everything we can put in front of a clinic owner today — the guarantee we sign, the numbers from our own clinic, the research behind the 60-second standard, and an empty frame where our live before/after lands. Nothing here is borrowed from someone else's case study.

What we can show you today

The guarantee — we work first, you pay when it worksSigned
Our own clinic's cost per lead, as an indexPublished
Lead-response research behind the 60-second standardSourced
Funnel models for a typical clinicLabelled
Client before/after resultsIn progress
Invented testimonials None, ever
Real names and quotes replace the slots as clinics sign.

The strongest proof we can offer

We work first.
You pay when it works.

For founding clients, the system is installed, live, and answering your enquiries before the first invoice. Payment begins when the standard is met — every eligible enquiry answered inside 60 seconds, every lead visible.

  • We run every client's system personally, so we take a small number of founding clinics per quarter
  • The standard is agreed in writing before install, and verified together
  • This is our answer to "why trust a firm you've never heard of" — we would rather prove it than promise it
Claim a founding slot →

How the founding engagement runs

Week 1–2 — we baseline your enquiry journeyNo fee
Week 3–4 — system installed and answeringNo fee
Standard met — every enquiry <60s, every lead visibleverified together
First invoice Only after that
Not met? No fees for the period.

Founding-client terms. Capacity per quarter is limited because one of us is on every engagement.

The operator story

We didn't study this problem.
We paid for it.

We own and operate a specialty clinic. Like most owners, we hired an agency to run patient acquisition. The reports arrived on time — impressions, clicks, cost per lead, every line trending the right way on paper. The consultation calendar told a different story.

So we fired the agency and rebuilt the campaigns ourselves: targeting, creative, landing flow, offer. Cost per lead fell 51% in 90 days. Same clinic, same city, same services, same team — half the acquisition cost.

Cheaper leads exposed the next leak. Enquiries arrived faster than anyone at the desk could answer them — evenings, weekends, mid-consultation. Patients messaged, heard nothing for hours, and booked with whoever replied first. We were paying less per lead and still losing them.

Nobody sold what we needed: something that answers in seconds, follows up until there is an outcome, and hands the booking to the front desk with full context. So we built it, and ran it on our own patients first. Every system we install has run in our own clinic first, on a real front desk, on real patients.

The sequence, in four chapters

01

We paid for the lesson

An agency ran our acquisition. The reporting was punctual. The calendar was not full.

02

We took the campaigns back

Rebuilt in-house, end to end. Cost per lead down 51% inside 90 days.

03

We found the second leak

Better leads, same slow answers. The loss had moved from the ad account to the front desk.

04

We built what nobody sold

Seconds to first reply, follow-up until there's an outcome, context handed to the desk.

We don't recommend anything we haven't run at our own front desk. When we quote a number, it is a number we have lived with.

Our own result

−51%

cost per lead in 90 days — our own clinic, after firing the agency and rebuilding the campaigns ourselves

We publish it as an index rather than a currency figure. The ratio is the point, and it travels across markets: half the acquisition cost, same city, same services, same team.

  • One clinic, one 90-day window, measured against its own baseline
  • Campaign work only — the response system came after this
  • Not a promise of your result. It is the reason we knew where to look

Cost per lead, indexed · 100 → 49

100 50 0 100 Agency-run day 0 49 Rebuilt in-house day 90 −51%
Our clinic's own campaigns, 90-day window, indexed. Percentages shown rather than currency.

What the research says

Speed to lead isn't our theory.
It is the most replicated finding in sales research.

We did not invent the 60-second standard. We set it because every serious study of lead response points the same direction, and because our own front desk proved the cost of missing it.

~7×

higher qualification rate when an enquiry is answered within the hour

Source: Harvard Business Review lead-response research.

Most

buyers choose the vendor that responds to them first

Source: widely replicated sales-response studies.

Minutes

are all it takes for the odds of reaching a new enquiry to collapse

Source: lead-response management research.

The odds don't fall at the end of the day. They fall by the minute.
THE WINDOW — FIRST MINUTES Enquiry arrives Most of the odds are already gone Where most clinics reply hours later, or next morning enquiry minutes first hour same day later Meera standard — the reply lands inside the shaded window, 24/7
Shape of the contact-rate decay reported in lead-response management research. Drawn as a shape, not as exact values — the finding is the steepness, not a specific percentage.

Published as it happens

No client case studies yet.
Here is where ours will land.

We could fill this section with stock quotes and rounded-up numbers. Instead the frame stays empty until our own clinic's baseline completes, and then it fills with the same before/after report we hand a client at day 90. If a month is flat, the flat month gets published too.

From our own clinic: the 30-day numbers

We're publishing our own clinic's live before/after — numbers land here monthly.

100 75 50 25 0 Baseline Day 10 Day 20 Day 30 Review Baseline month 1 in progress response time · contact rate · booked consultations
Live data from our own clinic. No cherry-picked case studies while we earn the real ones.

Average response time

Measuring

Every inbound enquiry, timestamped on arrival and on first reply. Computed from the event log, not typed by anyone.

Contact rate

Measuring

The share of enquiries that turn into a real two-way conversation, before and after the standard is in place.

Booked consultations

Measuring

Consultations booked and attended, traced back to the enquiry and the source that produced it.

From founding clients

The first quotes will be
earned, not written.

Three slots, reserved for the founding clinics. Each one fills with a real name, a real practice, and a number from that clinic's own before/after report — after the first 30 days, not before.

Slot 1 · reserved

"Founding client — quote pending."

—
Founding client
Name and practice published on their say-so
Result line lands with the day-30 report
Slot 2 · reserved

"Founding client — quote pending."

—
Founding client
Name and practice published on their say-so
Result line lands with the day-30 report
Slot 3 · reserved

"Founding client — quote pending."

—
Founding client
Name and practice published on their say-so
Result line lands with the day-30 report

We do not run invented testimonials, invented clinic counts, or invented revenue figures. An empty slot is more useful to you than a fabricated one.

Why not an agency

Same budget line.
Different accountability.

This is not a complaint about agencies. It is a description of what they are paid to do, and what they are not.

A marketing agencyMeeraLabs
AccountabilityActivity reportsOutcome ownership
North-star metricCost per leadBooked consultations that are attended
ReportingA monthly PDFLive visibility, plus one message every Monday
Who owns the numberNobodyA named partner
A lead that arrives at 9pmWaits till morningAnswered in seconds
Your risk at the startPaid up front, results pendingWe work first; you pay when it works
Do they run a clinic themselvesNoWe own and operate one

See what your own
baseline says.

30 minutes, owner to owner. We walk your enquiry-to-booking journey and show you where it leaks — two or three specific findings, whether or not we ever work together.

Book a Clinic Revenue Review →